Warren Buffett's 3 Favorite Books: A guide to The Intelligent Investor, Security Analysis, and The Wealth of Nations



Latest Buffett Headlines

Loading...

Saturday, July 21, 2012

BLOOMBERG: Buffett’s Berkshire Seen as Best Housing Pick: Chart of the Day



Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A) is the best investment for anyone seeking to benefit from a housing-market rebound, according to Joshua Brown, a vice president at Fusion Analytics Research Partners LLC.

The CHART OF THE DAY tracks Berkshire’s Class B stock, which Brown owns for clients of his New York-based firm. He cited the holding in a posting on his Reformed Broker website yesterday, when the Commerce Department reported that new U.S. homes were started at the fastest pace in about four years.

Class B shares have risen 30 percent from last year’s low, set on Sept. 22. The shares are 3.1 percent away from the highest price since October 2008, before the financial crisis reduced the value of equity investments and derivative contracts owned by Berkshire.

“It’s got the safety of a well-diversified business and it hits the housing market from virtually every angle,” Brown said in the posting. The Omaha, Nebraska-based company owns insurers, a food distributor, a railroad and a utility, among other units
.
Berkshire’s holdings in Wells Fargo & Co., the largest U.S. mortgage lender, and other banks are among the investments that stand to benefit from a homebuilding recovery, the posting said. Buffett’s company owns a more than $13 billion stake in Wells Fargo, second to Coca-Cola Co. among its largest holdings.

Several Berkshire units are also poised to gain, Brown wrote. Benjamin Moore & Co., a paint maker; Johns Manville, a maker of insulation and roofing materials; and Shaw Industries Group Inc., a carpet producer, are among them. They are part of a group that generated 17 percent of first-quarter revenue.

To contact the reporter on this story: David Wilson in New York at dwilson@bloomberg.net

Share Investor Links

Share Investor Blog - Stockmarket & Business commentary
Discuss this topic @ Share Investor Forum - Register free
Read the full transcript of the March 2 Squawk Box Interview with Warren Buffett
Download the 2010 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report
Download the 1977 - 2010 Warren Buffett Letter's to Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders

Warren Buffett @ Amazon


The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate America, Second EditionThe Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate America, Second Edition by Warren E. Buffett
Buy new: $24.32 / Used from: $17.64
Usually ships in 24 hours
The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of LifeThe Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life by Alice Schroeder
Buy new: $13.60 / Used from: $4.50
Usually ships in 24 hours


 

Thursday, July 12, 2012

CNBC: Transcript: Warren Buffett Says US Economic Growth Slowing

Published: Thursday, 12 Jul 2012 | 2:04 PM Et
By: Alex Crippen
Executive Producer




This is a transcript of Warren Buffett's Sun Valley live interview on CNBC's Squawk Box, July 12, 2012, from 7:30am to 8:00am ET. In his conversation with Becky Quick, Buffett says he now sees U.S. economic growth slowing, but residential housing is picking up slightly.
   He also says Europe has "been slipping pretty fast" over the past six weeks.


BECKY QUICK: Mr. Buffett, thank you for joining us this morning.
WARREN BUFFETT: It's good to be here.

BECKY: It's great to see you. And we couldn't think of a better time to have you on because there are so many questions about what's been going on with the economy, what's been going on with the jobs picture. Why don't you tell us what you're seeing right now in your businesses?

BUFFETT: Well, I've got a little different story this time. (Laughs.) For a couple years I've been telling you everything except residential housing was improving at a moderate rate — not crawling, but not galloping either — but that residential housing was flatlining. And the last two months it's been just sort of the opposite. The general economy in the United States has been more or less flat, and so the growth has tempered down. But the residential housing, we're seeing a pickup. It's noticeable. It's from a very low base. It doesn't amount to a whole lot yet, but it's getting better.  So you've got a kind of flip-flop on that.

BECKY: What happened? When we talked in the past you had said that when housing turned that would be when the U.S. economy would turn. What happened?

BUFFETT: Well, it hasn't changed all that much yet. But it is picking up. But at the same time the rest of the economy is slowing down. It's not heading downward but it's not growing at the rate that it was earlier. And then, it's kind of interesting in Europe. For a year or so, in most places, forget about Greece for the moment, but generally in Europe you didn't have a big slowdown. You had a lot of worry and all that. But in the last couple months in Europe, particularly in the past month, it's pretty much across Europe, things have really started to slip pretty fast.

BECKY: We've heard this from a lot of CEOs who joined us in the last several weeks. But what business lines in particular do you look at and you see these things popping up?

BUFFETT: All of the businesses that we have, and then I talk to people in other businesses. It's pretty clear that's what's going on right now. There are certain figures I can't tell you where I get them. Europe is really — it's headed downward in the last, I don't know, six weeks or so. And it wasn't going that way before. It wasn't doing that well, but it wasn't — and then it hit the skids.

BECKY: Is that because of consumers or because of businesses, confidence really slowing down and spending slowing down?

BUFFETT: Yeah, well, spending is slowing down and when spending slows down business reacts. They're not seeing the same kind of spending so they pull in their horns some.

BECKY: What, of the things you can talk about, the numbers that you do see, concern you the most?

BUFFETT: Well, it's pretty general, Becky. Like I say, it has not turned down yet in the United States. Our freight car loadings are up week-by-week. I normally get them today but I'm not home, so — but last week they're up — the eastern railroads were down moderately, but a lot of that's coal. But nevertheless, just across the board, when you're looking at our retail sales, jewelry or furniture or you name it — yards of carpet are down, our carpet business is better. But on the other hand, if you look at — we're the largest home builder in the country, Clayton Homes, and that's up, brick is picking up, but these are from low levels. But you are seeing — in our real estate brokerage firm, which is the second largest in the country, pending sales are up by a reasonable amount but from a very low base.

BECKY: Well with everything else — not a reversal, a slowdown in the growth, what happened? What happened six weeks ago to spook people, to spook businesses?

BUFFETT: I don't know the answer to that. I know the result. You could argue in Europe, why it was delayed so long? Because Europe has really been — you could see this coming for two — it was two years ago we saw a lot of our Spanish and Italian and even French bonds. We were overly cautious probably. But that was two years ago. Europe, with all that's going on, it probably kept it from having any kind of gains but it didn't really seem to sink in. But I would say the last, well I know the last couple months, with some acceleration, it's been hitting over there. 

BECKY: We've watched the jobs picture and the last employment numbers at 8.2 percent from that government report last Friday. Is that a chicken and egg cycle? Are people watching the jobs number and getting spooked by it, or is the jobs number kind of —

BUFFETT: Well, you're right. There is some circularity in it. I don't know the answer to exactly why it's happening. And I don't know what it will be three months from now or six months from now because three months ago I didn't know what it would be today. The U.S. economy is doing better than virtually any big economy around the world. This economy has come back a long way, with the exception of housing, from where it was a few years ago. And you can see it in corporate profits. I thought it would take housing — I still think it would take housing coming back to move us generally, significantly, upward and I still think that's true. But so far the little pickup in housing has not been near enough to offset whatever is going on in the world generally.

BECKY: The Fed came out with their minutes yesterday. Obviously they're concerned about the economy. They say that they could step in to do something else. But I guess the question becomes what would it take for them to step in and what do they do at that point?

BUFFETT: Yeah, I—  I have my own doubts. I'm sure Chairman Bernanke would disagree with me. And he knows a lot more about it than I do. But I—  I do—  I—  you know, when you get—  when you have interest rates down to—  to zero, not only here but—  in the main—  in the major com—  countries in Europe and—  and you have the—  you have a 15-year treasury inflation—  protected, so called TIPS, security selling at a negative yield. 

Fifteen years, people are willing to put their money out at a minus rate—  in real terms. That—  that—  that—  that—  that's about as far as you can go. I—  I—  I—  now I—  I'm—  you know, you can talk about more easing or that sort of thing. But—  you know, the banks are sitting with enormous amounts of money at the Fed. They don't want to be sitting with that money at the Fed. I mean, it—  it's—  it's bringing 'em a quarter of a percent or something. You lose money on that money at the Fed, just from the bank standpoint. So they're not happy having that money at the Fed. They just aren't seeing that much demand for—  for loans. 

BECKY: So—  

BUFFETT: Although they're picking up a little. I mean—  but it's—  nothing like—  people would like to see. I—  I don't see—  I don't see what the Fed does that's—  that—  is dramatic.
BECKY: Is—  does that mean we're in a "wait and see" pattern? And—  

BUFFETT: To some extent. And then it—  it—  it also means that—  that—  that—  (LAUGH) that they shouldn't be bicycling like crazy at the Fed while—  while—  well—  they—  they may—  maybe they should be bicycling like crazy, but it—  but while Congress sits there on the sidelines and—  and, you know—  and—  basically squabbles. 

BECKY: What should Congress be doing, at this point? I mean, we're gonna talk more with Simpson and Bowles a little later this morning. But you think that there's something that Congress should be doing right now? 

BUFFETT:  Well, I think—  I think people have a feeling that—  that—  that Congress is—  is inept. And—  and—  and—  and sort of paralyzed by—  by the desire of each side to make the other side look bad. So I—  I—  I think that has gotta be a factor in—  in—  in general confidence. You know, if you see your government not functioning, (LAUGH) it's not—  it's not really the most—  it's not the biggest spur to activity that you can imagine. 

BECKY: Yeah, maybe not a confidence booster, so to speak.

BUFFETT: Yeah, so—  so I—  I think—  I think it's hard for the Fed to offset the Congress, in terms of changing public opinion.

BECKY: Okay—  we're gonna have more with Warren Buffett in just a moment.

BECKY QUICK: We are live in Sun Valley. And we are joined by Warren Buffett. And Mr. Buffett—  well, let's get back to what we were talking about with Europe before. The spreads blew back out again. And all of the fixes we thought we'd seen from the ECB—  at this point, they seem to be lasting for less and less time. Back above 7 percent for some of these bonds. What's this mean? Where—  where are we headed? 

WARREN BUFFETT: Well, it means that—  that—  a fundamentally flawed system was designed some years back. And we've been trying to—  or they have been trying to patch it during the last couple of years. And—  and—  it's hard to change—  a very fundamental, important system with patches, particularly when 17 people have a say in where the patches should go and what kind of patches you should use. So it's—  it's—  it's—  it's not an easily solved problem. 

BECKY: Well, at this point, as you mentioned, it's really hurting the economy there, as well, starting to drag down in—  in a major way.

BUFFETT: Particularly in the last few months, yeah. 

BECKY: So what's the end result over the next six months or so? 

BUFFETT: Well, ten years from now, Europe will be working fine. But they—  they—  but the—  and they will be consuming more there. They'll—  they'll get it worked out. But—  but there's no obvious answer. And—  and—  and that becomes more and more apparent as they go along. And—  and like I say, they're—  they're—  they're trying to put patches on something that's got a lot of leaks. 

BECKY: But—  patches on something that has a lot of leaks, you could have a lot of different solutions to the end of that. Is the euro still gonna exist ten years from now? Europe will, but will the euro? 

BUFFETT: I don't know. I don't know. And I don't think they know. I mean, it—  it—  it certainly can't exist as originally designed. We've found out that—  that trying to have a common monetary unit, when you don't have somewhat common fiscal policies and cultures and work rules and all kinds of things—  just doesn’t work. And—  and—  how they'll—  how they'll resolve that is anybody's guess. 

BECKY: Obviously, it—  it depends on who's in charge, who the leaders are. And the leaders there seem to get voted out every time—  a new election comes along. So if there's a constant changing set of players at the table, how—  how is there a good solution?  

BUFFETT: Yeah, well, I—  I—  I—  I—  I—  I would not know the solution myself. I mean—  Henry Kissinger said a long time ago, you know, "If I want to call Europe, what number do I dial?" And—  and, you know, essentially, that's the problem. I mean, they—  the—  when we had our crisis in 2008, everybody knew the responsibility was on Bernanke and—  and Paulson and—  and—  with the president behind 'em. And—  as long as—  as long as they knew where they were going, they had the will and the—  and—  and—  and the ability to do things that were needed to do. But exactly who has the ability—  when—  when you don’t have a printing press, you—  it's—  it's a different animal.
BECKY: You know, we—  we've been watching the headlines—  over the last several weeks. And the manipulation of Libor is just the latest in a series of scandals—  that has to break down the public's trust in what happens with financial institutions, what happens on Wall Street. What—  what do you think about what's happened with Libor and how big of a deal is this? 

BUFFETT: Well, it—  it—  it's a big deal. It's a big deal. I mean, it—  you know, you've got the base rate for the whole world—  including—  including some—  loans we have—  in the past. And—  so—  the—  the idea that a bunch of traders can—  can—  start emailing each other or phone each other and—  and—  play—  and play around with that rate is—  is an important thing. And—  you know, it—  it is not good for the system. 

BECKY: Does it shake your confidence in the system?

BUFFETT: Well, I—  I've got a lot of confidence in the system over time. No, the—  our system works. I—  you know, we are sitting here in Sun Valley in pretty good circumstances, compared to a couple hundred years ago. So—  we're—  we're not working any harder than they worked 200 years ago. We're not any smarter. But we—  we live far differently. So our—  our system works over time. But—  but—  it sure shakes—  (Laughs) it shakes your faith in certain institutions, I'll put it that way. Not the—  but not the whole system. 

BECKY: I know Andrew's got a question for you, as well. 

JOE KERNEN: I just—  before Andrew's gonna talk about JPMorgan, I just, Warren, wanted to quickly ask. But—  Bob Diamond, very good executive—  I know that in the past—  you know, we—  Goldman had some P.R. and some—  you know, some ethics issues. You said—  I mean, you wouldn't want—  you—  I don't think you want—  Blankfein to lose his job. I don't know what you wanted to happen with the—  the officers at Wal-Mart. And I'm wondering whether you thought that this is an overshoot that—  that Diamond is just—  unceremoniously dumped. And—  you know, he was an American in—  in London. And—  I mean, would you—  don't—  wouldn't you rather have him stay, if you were a Barclay's shareholder?

BUFFETT: Well, I'm not a Barclay's shareholder. But I—  I don't think he had any choice but to go. When—  with something as big as Libor—  you know, if it happ—  it—  and he wasn't in charge of all of Barclay's, at that time. But—  but—  there are a lot of things that went on in that trading room—  that—  who knows who was aware of what? And I don't know anything specific about it. But—  that was not—  that—  it was not a rogue trader. Let's put it that way. 

JOE: You don't have different opinions based on whether you own shares in the stock, though, right? 

BUFFETT: Well, I—  no, not on this. But I—  I may know less about it. 

JOE: Sometimes—  sometimes maybe, yeah. 

BUFFETT: I haven't foll—  I haven't followed Barclay's. 

JOE: All right. 

ANDREW ROSS SORKIN: Hey Warren—  

BUFFETT: You know, at Salomon we had—  you know, some problems in—  and they had to go. 

ANDREW: Warren, talking about trust—  and a company that you do own a stock in, JPMorgan—  we're gonna hear from Jamie Dimon tomorrow what their earnings are. And we're gonna try to hear some more about what happened to that soured trade. Your views on—  on the trade itself? Your confidence in the company? Your confidence in Mr. Dimon?

BUFFETT: Yeah, I—  I think Jamie Dimon is one of the best bankers in the world. And—  if I had a bank—  I—  I like John Stumpf a lot too—  incidentally, at Wells Fargo. But if—  if—  if I owned a bank in Omaha and I could get Ja—  Jamie to—  to run it for me, I would feel very happy. And—  no, Jamie—  Jamie understands banking. He understands risk. And—  and—  you know, it was—  it's a significant loss. But you l—  you—  he—  J.P. Morgan lost billions and billions and billions of dollars on loans. I mean, if you—  if you've got a couple trillion dollar balance sheet, you're gonna have some losses some places. 

ANDREW: Do—  do you have any different views as a result of this, about the Volcker rule or some of the regulations that are part of Dodd-Frank? 

BUFFETT: Well, I—  my partner, Charlie Munger is more Old Testament than I am on this. But I—  I do think that—  I think there are good reasons to restrict the activities that banks can be in. 

ANDREW: So the activities that led to these losses, you would preclude JPMorgan from participating in, in the future? 

BUFFETT: Well, it—  it's—  it's hard to say what they—  those acti—  I mean, if they're truly hedging risks—  you know, I—  I—  there's—  there's certainly a lot to be said—  if—  if you're running a bank and you—  you—  you want to hedge interest rate risk, hedge foreign exchange risk, I mean, that—  that—  that's perfectly proper. We do it in our—  in our energy companies. We—  we have—  we have transactions all the time to hedge risks. 

So if somebody goes off the reservation and—  and starts—  turning hedging positions into speculative positions, you know, you may have a problem. But that—  that was not policy at JPMorgan. That—  you know, that was one fellow's —  near as I can ascertain that—  that—  that went very, very big in a position that was originally designed as a hedge position. And—  and then he put a hedge on a hedge and—  and—  pretty soon he had what they call a Texas hedge.

BECKY: Hey, Warren, can we go back to Libor for a moment, too? 

BUFFETT: Sure. 

BECKY: You mentioned that you have some contracts and some—  some things that are based off of Libor that have been there—  I—  I'm guessing derivatives and some other things that have been in that? 

BUFFETT: Well—  yeah, we—  we own some auction rate—  municipals, for example, that are priced off Libor —  a couple billion. 

BECKY: So what happens? If—  if Libor was manipulated, do you have a case to go back and have a complaint, to have—  a lawsuit, to have anything that comes up with any of this? 

BUFFETT: Well, I—  I think—  there certainly will be a bunch of lawyers that will think that. And—  and—  it—  if you can pin down the person that did something to you. And they had—  and—  there may well be some kind of a case. I mean, we—  we bought these securities in the market auction rate. Municipals that have—  they're tied to Libor. I have a feeling that in—  for any one entity, the amount might be very, very small, but—  but it—  

BECKY: It's over $3 trillion of things— 

BUFFETT: — but it's a huge mark—  oh, it's a huge market.

BECKY: — that are priced against this. 

BUFFETT: I mean—  it—  it's—  the—  the numbers would stagger you. 

BECKY: So—  how big of a problem could this turn out to be down the road? 

BUFFETT: It could turn out to be a big problem. But we don't know what banks did what, at this point. But—  but—  well, go back to our Salomon experience. You had one fellow with one bo—  a couple of bond issues, and—  it—  that caused a lot of trouble. And—  and you get Libor, then you're talking about the whole world. 

BECKY: Right. And everybody associated with it. 

BUFFETT: Everything is—  everything's tied in. And of course, you're in this terrible position, if you—  if you have—  millions of contracts based on Libor and one side profits from—  a given price being out of line, and the other side loses—  you're not gonna collect from the fellow that got the benefit. If you're in the middle of the trade, you're just gonna have the people on the losing side of each trade—  come after you. So it—  it—  it's very asymmetrical for the person that's got a bunch of trades on it. 

BECKY: Okay, so it could be a potentially huge can of worms.

BUFFETT: It's—  it—  it is a can of worms.

BECKY: It is a can of worms. (LAUGH)

BUFFETT: I will guarantee. It's—  it is a can of worms
.
BECKY: Okay. Warren, we're gonna have much more in just a moment. We want to thank you for your time.  


Current Berkshire stock prices

Class A: [BRK.A  133000.00    149.00  (+0.11%)   ]